NEWS
RELEASE
For Release Monday, June 19, 2006
Contact: Dan Ashby 510-233-2144
Contact: Jim Soper 510 258-4857 technical specialist
“NO
BASIS FOR CONFIDENCE IN PRIMARY ELECTIONS”
SAYS CALIFORNIA ELECTION PROTECTION NETWORK
NEWS RELEASE For Release Monday, June 19, 2006
Contact: Dan Ashby 510-233-2144
Contact: Jim Soper 510 258-4857
technical specialist “NO BASIS FOR CONFIDENCE IN PRIMARY
ELECTIONS” SAYS CALIFORNIA ELECTION PROTECTION NETWORK
The California Election Protection Network (CEPN), a nonpartisan
coalition of more than 25 election integrity organizations throughout
California, is calling for a full hand count of all ballots and
paper audit trails from San Diego County’s June 6 primary
election. CEPN has posted a Voters’ Resolution of No Confidence
on its website citing violations of California and federal election
regulations, and describing the vote counting process as “secret,”
without means for verification by voters, elections officials,
or the newsmedia.
“There is no proof of this election’s legitimacy,”
said CEPN member Jim Soper. “Despite a mountain of proof
that these machines are easily hackable, Secretary of State McPherson
certified the system claiming a set of handling procedures would
keep the machines safe. Now we learn that machines were unsecured
in pollworkers’ homes before the election, rendering those
procedures useless.”
In February, Secretary of State Bruce McPherson released a security
report he had commissioned of Diebold touch screen (DRE) and optical
scan voting machines. The report authored by University of California
computer scientists concluded that the machines should never be
left in the presence of fewer than two people, because one person
alone could implant malicious code that could alter vote-counting
functions without leaving any detectable evidence.
In San Diego County poll workers were allowed to take the machines
for “sleepover” storage in their homes for days prior
to the election.
The state report, “Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuBasic
Interpreter,” also said the machines could not be used unless
the secret “interpreter code” was removed or the law
changed to allow it. Neither was done. This same report confirmed
several previously reported vulnerabilities in the Diebold systems,
and announced the finding of 16 additional previously undisclosed
security risks.
Despite these clear threats to election security, McPherson certified
the machines for use in California elections.
“These elections were conducted under illegal conditions.
The results could very well have been compromised, and we have
no basis for confidence in the reported results,” said CEPN
member, Dan Ashby.
Soper, a software engineer, added, “The public needs to
understand that no amount of testing will ever detect hidden computer
code that can be secretly activated on election day. Nobody, and
no machine, should be counting our votes in secret.”
“Not only that, but the voters’ ballots are being
treated as a side-issue,” said Ashby. “Even before
all the votes were counted, Secretary McPherson declared Brian
Bilbray the winner of the 50th District Congressional run-off
election. On that basis--not the actual vote count--Republican
members of Congress staged a swearing-in ceremony in the Capitol.
They did this while tens of thousands of absentee and provisional
ballots remained uncounted.”
CEPN is calling upon San Diego County Registrar Mikel Haas and
Secretary McPherson to invalidate all reported results until the
outcome of each race can be verified through a hand count of all
legally cast votes. Calling it a “Free-Count” rather
than a recount, the CEPN citizen watchdogs insist that this manual
counting of the ballots be conducted without charge to the voting
public.
“The San Diego election department’s violation of
legal election procedure invalidated the original machine count,”
said Ashby. “It is the San Diego registrar’s obligation
to conduct a proper election, not bill the people to pay for his
blunder.”
With historical undertones, the CEPN Voters’ Resolution
of No Confidence draws from the U.S. Declaration of Independence,
which says the “just Power” of the government comes
from the “Consent of the Governed.”
“Under these illegal election conditions, the Consent of
the Governed is being assumed, not sought,” said Resolution
author Dave Berman, a CEPN member from Humboldt County’s
Voter Confidence Committee. Quoting from the Resolution, Berman
continued, “We, The People, DO NOT CONSENT to transferring
power and authority to candidates claiming victory in this illegitimate
election. We will do everything within our Constitutional and
Human Rights to protect and preserve possession of this power
that is inalienably Ours to be given but never taken away.”
The CEPN notes that its position is in solidarity with the No
Confidence stance taken by the Progressive Democrats of America,
Tribune Media Services columnist Bob Koehler, and the election
integrity organization VelvetRevolution.us, which is circulating
an online petition calling for a hand count of the San Diego ballots.
The CEPN Voters’ Resolution of No Confidence can be read
at: http://www.califelectprotect.net/no_conf-resol.html.
To view and print Resolution
of No Confidence as a PDF click here
The Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuBasic Interpreter can
be read at: http://tinyurl.com/hga4h
The Velvet Revolution online petition can be read and signed
at: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/content/busby-bilbray/busby-bilbray.php.